@Acceleration...

Tane4ka

2020-05-28 23:09

@Acceleration, for interest, "the beginning of a new YAK" - redraw of this Scorpion, and that's what gave me the analyzer:

So I guess "solution: >=0" - a very good reason for refusal!

nettaly

2020-05-28 23:12

Support your opinion, @Tane4ka vverh

Acceleration

2020-05-28 23:14

Well I decided its completely logical way, who is to blame that the program does not know how to solve! There was even a fad in moderation. And I know how to look for these options and they are not. Unfair it is to blindly believe the analyzer.

22yjz

2020-05-28 23:18

I also decided logically. Normal YAK

nettaly

2020-05-28 23:21

A method scientific it is possible to solve any YAK - exactly the same as collect "the Square of Malevich" in the puzzle.
We are not "blindly believe the analyzer," we trust the programmer who wrote this code. If you will be able to improve it - great, all will benefit.

Tverianka

2020-05-29 00:29

the rules are the same for all. determines their ADMIN.
so it is not necessary to argue, prove. just need the author to finish the crossword puzzle and stand again

Si vous avez trouvé une traduction inexacte ou erronée des éléments de l'interface du site, veuillez nous en informer: @GrandGames